SCR-LIP-000363 · Claim · machine-readable JSON →

In a systematic review of 32 studies (1154 patients), imaging methods proposed for characterizing lipedema include ultrasound (increased subcutaneous adipose tissue), lymphoscintigraphy (slowed lymphatic flow, inter-limb asymmetry), CT (symmetrical bilateral soft tissue enlargement without skin thickening or edema), MRI, MR lymphangiography (enlarged lymphatic vessels up to 2 mm), and DXA (leg fat mass/BMI ≥0.46 or leg fat/total fat ≥0.384), but their overall diagnostic performance was limited.

Created: 2026-05-31 · Last updated: 2026-05-31

Auto-compiled by the Layer 1 surveillance loop; not yet human-reviewed. anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 · 2026-05-31

Evidence over time

Evidence (1)

• DOI:10.1111/obr.13648 — refines · review · 2024
  Systematic review evaluating diagnostic imaging methods for lipedema; relevant to diagnostic criteria/reliability, refining by reporting that imaging-based diagnostic performance is currently limited rather than well-established.

Context (PECO)

Answers these questions

• What clinical criteria and stage/type classification systems are used to diagnose and grade lipedema, and how reliable are they? refines

Gaps & caveats

Auto-ingested single source; not yet human-reviewed.

Change log

• 2026-05-31 — created · auto-ingested for SQ-LIP-000022

← All claims