SCR-LIP-000364 · Claim · machine-readable JSON →

In a cross-sectional survey of 969 Spanish lipedema patients, diagnoses used the Schingale type I-IV classification (type III 41.7%, type IV 36.8%, type II 17.8%, type I 3.7%) and a modified Wolf/Herbst 13-criteria symptom scale; the authors validated a threshold of ≥6 of 13 symptoms (Mann-Whitney p=0.666 showing no distributional difference between diagnosed and undiagnosed groups), and diagnosis often required multiple consultations (51.2% needed ≥3 specialists).

Created: 2026-05-31 · Last updated: 2026-05-31

Auto-compiled by the Layer 1 surveillance loop; not yet human-reviewed. anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 · 2026-05-31

Evidence over time

Evidence (1)

• DOI:10.3390/ijerph20176647 — context · cross sectional · 2023
  The article explicitly applies the Schingale type classification and a modified Wolf/Herbst symptom scale, and proposes/validates a ≥6/13 symptom diagnostic criterion, directly describing clinical criteria and classification systems used fo

Context (PECO)

Answers these questions

• What clinical criteria and stage/type classification systems are used to diagnose and grade lipedema, and how reliable are they? context

Gaps & caveats

Auto-ingested single source; not yet human-reviewed.

Change log

• 2026-05-31 — created · auto-ingested for SQ-LIP-000022

← All claims